
Being charged with trafficking in controlled drugs is a serious criminal matter in South Australia. Depending on the quantity of drugs involved and the circumstances of the offence, a person convicted of drug trafficking may face substantial fines, lengthy imprisonment or, in the most serious cases, life imprisonment.
Under section 32 of the Controlled Substances Act 1984 (SA), there are three principal levels of drug trafficking offences:
Section 32(2a) also creates a separate offence of trafficking in a prescribed area, such as certain licensed premises (including hotels, clubs, licensed restaurants and the casino) or a venue where the public has gathered for a public entertainment, including areas used in connection with them, like patron car parks and entry queues.
These offences can involve drugs such as methamphetamine (ice), cocaine, MDMA (ecstasy), heroin and cannabis.
If you have been charged with drug trafficking, or are being investigated by police, obtaining legal advice at the earliest opportunity is essential.
Under the Controlled Substances Act 1984 (SA), trafficking in a controlled drug means:
Importantly, a person does not need to have completed a sale to be guilty of trafficking. Possessing drugs with the intention of selling them can be sufficient.
A person may also be charged with trafficking if they knowingly participate in the process of a drug sale, even if they are not the person who ultimately sells the drugs.
The prosecution may rely on evidence including intercepted communications, mobile phone messages, financial transactions, surveillance footage, packaging materials, electronic scales and the quantity of drugs located by police.
However, the mere presence of drugs or other suspicious items does not necessarily establish that a person has committed a trafficking offence.
Drug trafficking offences carry some of the most serious penalties under South Australian criminal law.
A conviction may result in a lengthy prison sentence and a criminal record. In addition, the Director of Public Prosecutions may apply for orders restraining assets, including money, vehicles and real estate, and property may be forfeited, under the Criminal Assets Confiscation Act 2005 (SA).
At Stanley & Co Lawyers, our criminal defence lawyers have experience representing clients charged with serious drug offences throughout South Australia.
We can review the prosecution evidence, examine the legality of police searches, challenge allegations of possession or trafficking, negotiate charges where appropriate and represent you in court.
If you or someone you know has been charged with trafficking in controlled drugs, trafficking in a commercial quantity or trafficking in a large commercial quantity, Stanley & Co Lawyers can assist.
Our criminal defence lawyers represent clients facing serious drug offences in Adelaide and throughout South Australia.
We can advise you about the strength of the prosecution case, available defences, possible penalties and the options for defending or resolving the charges.
Contact Stanley & Co Lawyers on 08 7001 6135 to arrange a complimentary 30-minute, no-obligation consultation.
Answer
To establish a charge of trafficking in a controlled drug under section 32(3), the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that:
For offences under sections 32(2) and 32(1), the prosecution must also establish the relevant commercial or large commercial quantity and the required intention to traffic that quantity.
The prosecution does not need to establish that the accused knew the precise identity or weight of the controlled drug.
Each element must be established to the required criminal standard.
The maximum penalties depend on the offence charged, the quantity of drugs and whether aggravating circumstances or serious drug offender provisions apply.
The court may impose both imprisonment and a fine.
Where an offence under section 32(3) is aggravated, or the offender meets the statutory definition of a serious drug offender, the maximum increases to 15 years' imprisonment and/or a $75,000 fine.
For commercial quantity offences under section 32(2), the corresponding maximum increases to life imprisonment and/or a $500,000 fine.
For trafficking in a prescribed area under section 32(2a), the maximum rises to 25 years' imprisonment and/or a $200,000 fine where the offence is aggravated or the offender is a serious drug offender.
These are maximum penalties, not mandatory sentences. The sentence imposed will depend upon the circumstances of the offence and the offender.
The quantity required for a commercial or large commercial quantity offence depends upon the particular drug.
The prescribed quantities are contained in the Controlled Substances (Controlled Drugs, Precursors and Plants) Regulations 2014 (SA).
For example:
These examples demonstrate why it is important to distinguish between the quantity of a drug in its pure form and the total weight of a mixture containing that drug.
The applicable threshold also depends on how the quantity is alleged in the charge. Laboratory analysis and the prosecution's calculations may be important issues in defending a commercial quantity allegation.
Different thresholds apply to other controlled drugs.
Yes.
Under section 32(5), where the prosecution proves that an accused possessed a trafficable quantity of a controlled drug, the law creates a rebuttable presumption concerning the intention or purpose of sale.
For example, the prescribed trafficable quantity for methamphetamine is 2 grams of a mixture containing the drug.
However, possession of a trafficable quantity does not automatically establish every element of a trafficking offence.
The presumption is rebutted only if the accused proves, on the balance of probabilities, that the drugs were not possessed for the purpose of sale, for example because they were for personal consumption.
Evidence concerning drug dependence, patterns of consumption and the circumstances in which the drugs were found may be relevant.
If the trafficking allegation cannot be established, a lesser possession offence may be available, depending on the evidence.
The available defences depend on the circumstances of the particular case.
1. Lack of Possession
The accused may dispute having possession or control of the drugs. This can be particularly relevant where drugs are located in a shared home, vehicle or other location accessible to multiple people.
2. No Intention to Sell
Where the charge is based on possession with intent to sell, the accused may contest that intention. If the trafficable quantity presumption applies, the accused must prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the drugs were not for sale.
3. Lack of Knowledge
The accused may dispute knowing, or being reckless as to whether, the substance was a controlled drug.
4. Insufficient Evidence of Participation
Where a person is accused of participating in a drug sale, the prosecution must establish their relevant involvement. Mere association with someone involved in drug trafficking is not necessarily sufficient.
5. Disputing the Quantity of Drugs
For commercial and large commercial quantity offences, the drug quantity is an essential issue. The defence may examine the forensic analysis, purity, weight, calculations and evidence concerning the quantity allegedly trafficked.
6. Unlawfully Obtained Evidence
A lawyer may challenge the legality of police searches, seizures or investigative procedures. In appropriate circumstances, an application may be made to exclude evidence.
Other defences, including duress, may arise depending on the facts.
Yes.
Police do not need to observe an actual drug transaction to lay a trafficking charge.
A charge may be based upon possession of drugs with intent to sell, communications concerning proposed sales or evidence of participation in the selling process.
However, the prosecution must still establish the elements of the particular offence, subject to any applicable statutory presumptions.
An aggravated offence under section 43 of the Controlled Substances Act 1984 (SA) can arise where trafficking is committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with a criminal organisation, or in other circumstances involving identification with such an organisation specified by the legislation.
The Act also imposes higher maximum penalties on people who meet the statutory definition of a serious drug offender, which depends on qualifying previous convictions.
These provisions can significantly increase the potential sentence.
Serious trafficking charges generally commence in the Magistrates Court before proceeding through the indictable process to a higher court, ordinarily the District Court.
However, section 32(4) provides a particular exception for section 32(3) offences involving only cannabis, cannabis resin or cannabis oil. Those charges must be dealt with by the Magistrates Court as summary offences, subject to the statutory provision for committal to the District Court for sentence where the Magistrates Court considers that imprisonment exceeding five years is appropriate.
The court process will depend on the charge and the circumstances of the case.
Potentially.
Under the Criminal Assets Confiscation Act 2005 (SA), authorities may seek orders restraining assets suspected of being connected with criminal activity or otherwise subject to confiscation laws.
These orders may affect:
Confiscation proceedings are separate from the determination of the criminal charge, and property is not necessarily forfeited merely because a person has been charged.
However, a conviction for trafficking in a commercial or large commercial quantity makes a person a prescribed drug offender. A forfeiture order is then taken to have been made over all property they own or effectively control on the day of conviction, subject to limited exceptions. Repeat convictions for serious drug offences within 10 years can have the same result.
It is important to obtain legal advice about both the criminal allegations and any restraining or forfeiture proceedings.
If police contact you about a suspected drug trafficking offence, you should seek legal advice before participating in an interview.
A criminal lawyer can advise you about your rights and obligations, including your right to silence and any lawful requirements to provide identifying information or comply with police directions.
Early legal advice can also assist in preserving evidence and preparing for any bail application or court proceedings.
27
Combined Years Of Experience


